http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/ The journal of Paul M. Watson Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:41:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta1 hourly 1 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/comment-page-1/#comment-7040 Jonathan Brazil Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:06:47 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/#comment-7040 I agree, it's refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ;) ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the "L Word" or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I'm a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don't even get a mention. Perhaps there'll never truly be a list that isn't somewhat biased to the choosing parties... I agree, it’s refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the “L Word” or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I’m a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don’t even get a mention. Perhaps there’ll never truly be a list that isn’t somewhat biased to the choosing parties…

]]> http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/comment-page-1/#comment-9085 Jonathan Brazil Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:06:47 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/#comment-9085 I agree, it's refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ;) ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the "L Word" or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I'm a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don't even get a mention. Perhaps there'll never truly be a list that isn't somewhat biased to the choosing parties... I agree, it’s refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the “L Word” or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I’m a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don’t even get a mention. Perhaps there’ll never truly be a list that isn’t somewhat biased to the choosing parties…

]]> http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/comment-page-1/#comment-9086 Jonathan Brazil Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:06:47 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/#comment-9086 I agree, it's refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ;) ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the "L Word" or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I'm a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don't even get a mention. Perhaps there'll never truly be a list that isn't somewhat biased to the choosing parties... I agree, it’s refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the “L Word” or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I’m a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don’t even get a mention. Perhaps there’ll never truly be a list that isn’t somewhat biased to the choosing parties…

]]> http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/comment-page-1/#comment-2856 Jonathan Brazil Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:06:47 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/06/11/hot-100-as-picked-by-thinking-feeling-people/#comment-2856 I agree, it's refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ;) ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the "L Word" or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I'm a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don't even get a mention. Perhaps there'll never truly be a list that isn't somewhat biased to the choosing parties... I agree, it’s refreshing to see an alternative list with the promise of more thought having gone into it. Sadly having quickly leafed through the list (purely for research purposes ) I fear that the promise may have been a pretense. The top slots are dominated by females who have either starred in the “L Word” or have been widely acknowledged to be bisexual at some time or another or have starred in lesbian-styled roles. As you say you kinda have to ignore that to an extent given the context. However, if the schedule was even slightly biased to the weighting of classic and timeless beauty then one has to question the positioning of Ellen DeGeneres above contenders such as Michelle Pfeiffer and Nicole Kidman, not that I’m a great fan of either. Subjectivity, eye of the beholder and all that there are a few that I would have included in that list who don’t even get a mention. Perhaps there’ll never truly be a list that isn’t somewhat biased to the choosing parties…

]]>