Comments on: Google Reader’s waterfall feature http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/ The journal of Paul M. Watson Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:53:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta1 hourly 1 By: diesel pham http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-8635 diesel pham Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:12:59 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-8635 The world . The world .

]]> By: diesel pham http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-7425 diesel pham Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:12:59 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-7425 The world . The world .

]]> By: diesel pham http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-5801 diesel pham Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:12:59 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-5801 The world . The world .

]]> By: paulmwatson http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-8634 paulmwatson Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:26:22 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-8634 It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.<br><br>Google Reader shouldn't change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news. It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.

Google Reader shouldn’t change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news.

]]> By: paulmwatson http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-7424 paulmwatson Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:26:22 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-7424 It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.<br><br>Google Reader shouldn't change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news. It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.

Google Reader shouldn’t change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news.

]]> By: Google Reader really broken Life is grand http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-5800 Google Reader really broken Life is grand Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:44:26 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-5800 [...] Seems as though something went bang at Google Reader. After this morning&#8217;s problems I just checked my Starred Items list and found a bunch of old items and none of my recently Starred Items. I used it like a temporary bookmarking system, starring those items I want to read later. Once I have read them I unstar them. I had about 20 items in the list yesterday. Today there are 5 and they are from several weeks ago, items I had read and unstarred back then. [...] [...] Seems as though something went bang at Google Reader. After this morning&#8217;s problems I just checked my Starred Items list and found a bunch of old items and none of my recently Starred Items. I used it like a temporary bookmarking system, starring those items I want to read later. Once I have read them I unstar them. I had about 20 items in the list yesterday. Today there are 5 and they are from several weeks ago, items I had read and unstarred back then. [...]

]]> By: Shog9 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-8633 Shog9 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:43:11 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-8633 So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?<br>I don't want to think of feeds as emails (and don't use my email program as a feedreader for that reason...), but i fail to see how you've made an argument here... So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?
I don’t want to think of feeds as emails (and don’t use my email program as a feedreader for that reason…), but i fail to see how you’ve made an argument here…

]]> By: Shog9 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-7423 Shog9 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:43:11 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-7423 So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?<br>I don't want to think of feeds as emails (and don't use my email program as a feedreader for that reason...), but i fail to see how you've made an argument here... So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?
I don’t want to think of feeds as emails (and don’t use my email program as a feedreader for that reason…), but i fail to see how you’ve made an argument here…

]]> By: paulmwatson http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-5799 paulmwatson Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:26:22 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-5799 It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts. Google Reader shouldn't change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news. It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.

Google Reader shouldn’t change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news.

]]> By: Shog9 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-5798 Shog9 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:43:11 +0000 http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-5798 So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS? I don't want to think of feeds as emails (and don't use my email program as a feedreader for that reason...), but i fail to see how you've made an argument here... So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?
I don’t want to think of feeds as emails (and don’t use my email program as a feedreader for that reason…), but i fail to see how you’ve made an argument here…

]]>