Archive for the ‘Apple’ Category

Owning music

Friday, April 27th, 2007

Not to be a Steve Job’s fan boy but he understands my needs when he says I want to “own” my music and not rent it.

It is not the legal side of renting music that bothers me so but rather the technical side. You need to connect with a server every now and then to keep listening to your library of music. If you don’t the music stops playing. Not only do businesses come and go but the standards and systems they support change. They don’t always provide an easy path from one system to another either (Microsoft recently dumped their Plays For Sure system with the Zune system. Your Plays For Sure music won’t play on a Zune.)

I doubt very much that a library of music I rent now will continue to work as is in 10 years time. There will be breaking changes between now and then.

The same is true with DRM stamped media.

At least as a technically savvy user I know I can keep my non-DRM, non-rented music library playing for as long as I want. As changes happen I’ll either find tools or make tools that bridge the change.

It will be a lot harder to bridge the change with a rented or DRM stamped library.

Wallet loosening Macs

Thursday, March 1st, 2007

Mac OS X has an amazing ability to loosen the wallets of its users. In all my years of Windows computing I personally bought exactly one application; Winzip. And that purchase was more out of guilt for having used it for years and never paid. Funnily enough I switched to Mac OS X a short month after buying Winzip. Most of the other software I had installed was free or provided by a MSDN subscription.

In the few months I have had a Mac though I have bought TextMate, Omnigraffle, Photoshop, Fireworks and now Synergy.

The initial reaction to this is that Windows is better because “it has more free software for it and so you don’t need to pay” which is technically true. On another level though Mac OS X is better; The level of the computer as a productive tool and not an end in itself.

Synergy proves this out for me. It is a $5 utility app. that controls iTunes. I would never have paid for a Windows equivalent because nothing on Windows comes close to the quality of Synergy. It integrates so beautifully with the Mac OS X menu bar (and system-wide keyboard shortcuts) that after a few days of free use I realised it was worth more than $5.

Synergy feels like it is part of my daily Mac OS X experience. It is there when I need it, out of the way when I don’t and it works as if I had personally told the developer exactly what I wanted and he had gone and made it.

A lot of Mac OS X software is like this.

I can’t think of any Windows software like this. Maybe iTunes on Windows…

If I had read this post a few months ago, when I was still a Windows user, I would have scoffed at it. I would have said it was some air-headed Apple fanboy under the influence of Jobsian spells.

Now I think the reality is that Windows is the one casting spells on its users. Spells of illusion, of forgetfulness and of tolerance for poor quality. More to the point; Windows casts the spell of practicality which pervades enterprise thinking. It is the grey-suited men telling you what is good for you and you sucking it down for your rationalised life.

And before you say it; If I’m going to suck anything down I’d rather suck it down from a black pollo-neck wearing wizard who dares to dream.

Macs and Mac OS X are something you have to use to appreciate. It changes your computing experience, from the frustrating chore that is Windows where you spend more time dealing with a computer than with what you are trying to achieve. With Mac OS X I find I get more done and in a more pleasant manner. That is important, that I enjoy what I am doing while I am doing it.

I don’t expect Windows users to like hearing this or think it is even remotely true. It takes actual sit down time with a Mac and Mac OS X to have the spell lifted.

Remember, I was a Windows user for 14 years. I developed with Microsoft technologies, used Microsoft tools and thought Apple was a high-priced toy that had lost touch with reality. How things change.

iPhone FAQ

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

Yes, more iPhone coverage. This time a FAQ from David Pogue who got to play with it; The Ultimate iPhone FAQ.

Here are the ones that caught my eye:

  • Can it run Mac OS X programs? –No.
  • Can I add new programs to it? –No.
  • Does it connect to iChat? –No.
  • Does it get onto the HSDPA (3G) high-speed Internet network that Cingular has rolled out in a few cities? –No. But Steve Jobs said a later version of the iPhone will — once there’s enough HSDPA coverage in this country to justify it.
  • Does the Web browser support Flash or Java? –No. (No Flash! That bites.)
  • Can it open Word and Excel documents? –No.
  • Does it connect to standard iPod accessories like car docks and speaker systems? –Yes!
  • Will it sync with Outlook? –No.
  • Won’t the screen get smudgy? –It does, but you don’t see it except when the screen is off. The one I played with was pretty streaky, but wiping it on my sleeve cleaned it completely.

And a good video of the iPhone:

It’s the user interface

Friday, January 12th, 2007

The more I orbit the solar system of iPhone commentary the more eccentric my orbit becomes. A few hours ago it became so eccentric I smashed into the planet known as The Touchscreen Debate; first rock from the sun, closest to the damning and purifying fire. I burnt up as I plummeted through the thick atmosphere of touchscreen criticism and ended up a cinder in their camp. How can I dial without looking at it? Gestures might help but that isn’t intuitive, you have to learn that. No tactile feedback seems a killer blow, a meteoric impact.

And so I began fiddling around with my Nokia mobile phone, a very basic model which does nothing well but is better than the more expensive, complicated devices which do nothing at all, least of all audio.

I realised I didn’t actually use speed dial. Most of my phone usage is texting, good old SMS. Who speed dials an SMS? I realised I didn’t sit in meetings furtively texting under a table either. The only two times I ever used the keypad without looking was when I was driving, which is pretty dangerous and illegal so maybe it isn’t a good thing we can do that anyway, and when I locked and unlocked the keypad. The latter you can do without looking on the iPhone too, you just drag your fingers across the screen, apparently.

The more I used my Nokia the more I remembered how much I hated the software interface on it. Not the physical interface but the software. Reading an old text takes 5 key-presses and about 7 seconds for the inbox too load. If I want to read the next message I have to press 3 keys to get out of the current one and back into the inbox. Sending a text takes about 7 key-presses (excluding the message) and depends on where the contact is in the list. Scrolling menus is a click, click, click, click, click affair. No smooth scroll, no dragging a finger down a screen or trackpad.

Getting a number from a text into the phone book is a chore. Finding a contact and reading a note is a mission. Visiting a URL, even a bookmarked one, involves so many sub-menus I cannot tell anyone where it is on the Nokia. I have to find that menu again everytime I want it.

Pretty much everything takes more key-presses, more scrolling and more waiting than it should.

The iPhone might not have a keypad but the software on it has the potential to be like the software on my MacBook Pro. Intuitive, aesthetically pleasing, taller than 7 lines of monochrome text. Things that work vertically will work well, things that work horizontally (landscape) will work better.

If I want to enter numbers on my Nokia during a text message I have to hold down the number key for 3 seconds to tell the phone that I want the number and not one of the three possible letters. That makes entering an 8 digit phone number take almost half a minute. On the iPhone I’ll have a QWERTY keyboard and a numeric keypad available whenever I need.

Wait a minute. How can I say any of this when you, me and 99% of Earth haven’t even used the iPhone? Call it a hunch. Call it “I’ve used Apple software and it is more usable.” Call it “An iPod with a tiny, monochrome screen is fifty times easier to use than most smartphones with full-colour, 8 inch screens.”

Call it what you want but Apple know how to do user interfaces. And that is what they have done with the iPhone. They have looked at Nokia, looked at Motorola, looked at even the BlackBerry and laughed so hard they’d almost prefer to be Zune users.

Then they went and put Apple UI know-how on a mobile phone.

That can’t be bad.

No buttons? Gestures.

Friday, January 12th, 2007

Reading Kottke’s roundup of iPhone coverage I was struck by the following comment:

You could have different swipes and taps as a speed dial mechanism…swipe the screen from top left to bottom right and then tap in the lower right hand corner to call mom, that sort of thing.

That is very interesting. A lot of people are complaining that a touchscreen interface won’t let them dial without looking at the screen. Firstly, none of them have even used the iPhone touchscreen. It could be rubbish or Apple might have figured something out. We don’t know.

But gestures would go a long way towards solving that problem. I already use gestures on the trackpad of my MacBook Pro. It works very well and you don’t have to stare at the trackpad.

Will there be custom gesture software in the iPhone? I hope so. Three taps and the pizza joint is dialled.

Apple’s iPhone and Cisco’s trademark

Tuesday, January 9th, 2007

If you were wondering about Cisco’s trademark on iPhone and now Apple announcing their iPhone; Cisco expects agreement with Apple.

“We expect to receive a signed agreement today,” she [Cisco] said.

The Apple Phone

Tuesday, January 9th, 2007

I hope SvN is right about the unconfirmed Apple phone; simple, elegant, focused, quality. Apple.

And it must be GSM and unlocked so everyone and not just Cingular users get to buy it. My Nokia is nearing its end.

Zune reviews

Friday, November 10th, 2006

Just been reading two reviews of Microsoft’s Zune player and while it isn’t terrible it isn’t going to convert any iPod users or be an iPod killer in the stores.

The NYT review[^] is a bit biased IMO (I own an iPod too but jeez author, get a life) but it brings up some frankly weird points about the Zune:

  1. The Zune has WiFi, fantastic. Except you can only use it to send songs to other Zunes. You can’t connect to a PC, network or any other WiFi device. WTF?
  2. You can’t use it as an external HD. Sorry folks, no USB drive in Explorer for the Zune. WTF?
  3. The screen is bigger. Except it has the same resolution as an iPod.
  4. Real world testing shows poorer battery life than an equivalent iPod (two hours less.) And yet the Zune is bigger and heavier.
  5. No podcast support from what I can tell. Crikey.
  6. Songs are $0.99 but you have to buy credit bundles of $5 or more.
  7. Songs are listed as costing 79 “points” which sounds cool except 79 points will cost you $0.99. Now that is marketing.
  8. The software media player is seemingly a stripped down Windows Media Player. You can’t use WMP with your Zune.
  9. Getting all your existing music onto a Zune is a long conversion process if it works at all.

The other review[^].

It seems OK but nothing to rush out for.

Go (RED) with Apple

Friday, October 13th, 2006

redipod03bkgrnd20061012 In a nice move by Apple you can now buy a red iPod nano and support the Bono backed (RED) campaign. $10 is donated to the AIDS cause for each (PRODUCT)RED you buy at $199.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MacBook Pro Diaries #001: It begins

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

My MacBook Pro arrived a few hours ago and I have been bumbling along since. Mac OSX is a strange beast when you have spent 16 years using DOS/Windows systems. Thankfully I have a good friend on IM stepping me through bits of it. So far I have manged to freeze OSX twice (thanks to Front Row) and it has had to restart twice after downloading a bunch of updates. Strangely like Windows that. Haven’t had any virus or spyware installing itself though, refreshing after the terror that is connecting a fresh Windows XP install to the net. No maximised windows is very, very weird.

Mac OSX is super slick though. Expose has that refined edge the Windows Vista clone doesn’t. The way Front Row zooms in and out is something to behold. Super, super smooth on this hardware (2gig RAM, 2.16Ghz Intel Core Duo etc. etc.) Love the little remote, hilarious controlling iTunes from across the room.

The whole DMG, installing applications thing was confusing at first but I’ve got the hang of it now. Leave my desktop alone damnit!

And the hardware. Oh man, the hardware. Even the packaging is beautiful. I don’t want to throw away the egg shell styrofoam or tuck the black box away in a cupboard next to my boring, carboard HP laptop box. The magnetic power connector is… you have to try it to believe it. Fiona let out a delighted laugh when she tried it and she isn’t even a nerd like me. Such a beautiful screen too, bright and clear, full of colour (not the glossy option). Keyboard works like a charm, typing away as if I’d been using it for years.

I did have hassles connecting to the office network over ethernet. My Windows HP laptop connects fine to it without any setup but the MacBook Pro refuses even when I enter in details manually. The IT guys say they have to allow it into the network but that seems strange to me when the HP laptop has no hassles. It is a Linux network by the way, not Windows.

Connecting to the net at home over WiFi was a doddle though.

Now onto getting Mac equivalent apps that I need, setting up Firefox with extensions, trying out TextMate and getting Ruby on Rails up and running along with Subversion and all that. Then I’ll give bootcamp and parallels a try as well as that new Windows-window-app thingy.

Should be a blast.

Photobabe

Oh, and Photobooth with the iSight is hilarious.